[招待制セミナー/Invitation-only Seminar] 「AIに焦点を当てた法の最新動向/Latest Developments in Law Focused on AI」
|
タイトル |
AIに焦点を当てた法の最新動向 |
|
日時 |
2026年11月9日(月)13:10~17:00(開場13:00) |
|
会場 |
日比谷国際ビル コンファレンススクエア(〒100-0011 東京都千代田区内幸町2丁目2-3 日比谷国際ビル8階) |
| 定員 Capacity |
50名 ※定員になり次第受付終了とさせていただきます。 50 persons *Registration will close once capacity is reached. |
|
参加費 |
無料 |
|
主催 |
渥美坂井法律事務所・外国法共同事業、DLA Piper Atsumi & Sakai, DLA Piper |
|
講師 |
渥美坂井法律事務所・外国法共同事業 |
| 言語 Language |
英語 ※日本語への同時通訳はございません。 English (without Japanese simultaneous interpretation) |
| 概要 Overview |
グローバルに展開する日本企業のためのAI戦略と戦術 ・営業秘密の保護、プライバシーとデータ主権、弁護士秘匿特権、EU AI法、日本におけるサイバー防御義務、社内のAI利用ポリシー、企業スパイ、AI関連知的財産の価値評価にわたり、法改正と新たなリスクを扱います。 ・AIガバナンスの体制整備、秘密情報の保護、国境をまたぐコンプライアンス対応、AIをめぐる紛争への備えについて、実務的な指針を示します。 AI Strategies and Tactics for Global Japanese Firms · In the US, the rules on AI are being shaped largely through litigation; in Japan and the EU, largely through regulation. The programme sets the two side by side, so that companies operating across these markets can see both kinds of risk in one afternoon. · We will address legal changes and emerging risks across trade secret protection, privacy and data sovereignty, legal privilege, the EU AI Act, cyber defence obligations in Japan, internal AI use policies, corporate espionage, and valuation of AI-related intellectual property. · Participants will receive practical recommendations for building stronger AI governance frameworks, protecting proprietary information, managing cross-border compliance obligations, and preparing for disputes involving AI technologies. |
| プログラム Program |
13:00 – 13:10|受付 テーマ:営業秘密と知財戦略 テーマ:日本の法と政策
14:25 – 14:50|セッション3:AIの文脈における弁護士秘匿特権 ・秘密性が失われれば、弁護士依頼者間秘匿特権とワークプロダクトの保護も失われる ・裁判所はこの問題に取り組んでおり、秘匿特権を失う当事者が現に出ている ・AIは強力な法的ツールであり、使い方の組み立てが重要となる ・保護命令、さらにはNDAについての実務上の助言
· Comparative definitions and protections under Japanese, Korean and EU law · Consent as disclosure – examining the terms and conditions of AI models · Reasonable measures in the AI context – Practical implications · Emerging issues with prompt injection · Trade secret protection under Japan’s Unfair Competition Prevention Act when AI tools are used: what confidentiality management now requires, and how employee use of AI affects protection · Japan’s active cyber defence legislation, with the main provisions commencing in October 2026: asset notification and incident reporting duties on critical infrastructure operators, and the knock-on effect on suppliers and IT contractors · Cybersecurity and frontier AI: the government response to AI models capable of autonomous vulnerability discovery, including the alerts to the fifteen critical infrastructure sectors and the Financial Services Agency’s request to financial institutions, and what is now expected of boards of directors · Loss of confidentiality implies loss of attorney-client privilege and work product protection · Courts are wrestling with these issues – and parties are losing their attorney-client privilege · AI is a powerful legal tool, so the framing matters · Practical advice for protective orders – and perhaps for NDAs? · Where the AI Act stands after the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), in force since 27 July 2026: high-risk obligations deferred to 2 December 2027 for stand-alone systems and to 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in regulated products · What applies regardless of the deferral: the prohibited practices, including those added by the Omnibus, and the Article 50 transparency and content-marking obligations · When a Japanese company falls within the Act’s reach as a provider or deployer, and how obligations are allocated along the supply chain · How the Act interacts with the GDPR, and what to expect from the separate Digital Omnibus on data and cybersecurity, which is still under negotiation · Overview of how courts and IP offices are treating the competing requirements of enablement, written description, and obviousness in the context of AI generated or enhanced patent applications · Explore how AI technology is simultaneously enhancing IP protection while altering the bedrock standards on which new IP is built 4:00 - 4:45 | Session 6: Panel Discussion and Q&A: Corporate Espionage, BYO-AI Policies, and Trade Secret Theft (Panel: Atsumi &Sakai and DLA Piper; Moderator: Dr. Köksal Sahin, LL.M.) Focus: Employment Law, Corporate Espionage, and Internal Data Security· Addressing employee use of unauthorized third-party consumer AI tools in corporate environments · Providing operational frameworks to enforce AI usage policies in view of company Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) frameworks · Preventing corporate espionage (for example, if a competitor company prompts a public AI platform to divulge trade secret information) · Prompt Injection · How the answers differ between the US, where they are being worked out through litigation, and Japan and the EU, where regulation is setting them, and what that means in practice for companies operating in all three |
|
お申し込み |
以下のリンクよりお申し込みください。 |
| お問い合わせ Inquiries |
Marketing & PR Division, Atsumi & Sakai |
*但し、日本における外国法事務弁護士の登録はない。
**Not Registered as a Foreign Lawyer in Japan